Nasiri
Nasiri v. T.A.G. Security Protective Services Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ELIAS NASIRI, Case No. 18-cv-01170-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. Re: Dkt. No. 119
T.A.G. SECURITY PROTECTIVE
SERVICES INC., et al., Defendants. 16 In this lawsuit, plaintiff Elias Nasiri accuses Defendants of violating California and federal labor laws. Although defendant T.A.G. Security Protective Services Inc. (“T.A.G.”) initially appeared, its attorney has since withdrawn and, because T.A.G. cannot represent itself in court, its answer has been stricken. See Dkt. No. 74. Nasiri now moves for default judgment against T.A.G. See Dkt. No. 119. Nasiri’s motion, however, fails to adequately explain how it arrived at its damages calculation. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Nasiri’s motion for default judgment without prejudice. I. Background T.A.G. provides security services. See Dkt. No. 80 (“SAC”) ¶ 11. Between June …