Guice

Guice v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20203:18-cv-06860California6,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIELLE G., Case No. 18-cv-06860-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 Defendant.

Plaintiff Danielle G. seeks social security disability benefits for physical and mental impairments caused by Borrelia Hermsii (a tick-borne illness), including paralysis in the hands and feet, vision problems, neurological issues, rapid heart rate, and low cortisol. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 265.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for benefits. (Dkt. No. 1.) Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s motions for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 16 & 17.) Because the decision of the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to deny benefits is supported by substantial evidence and free of legal error, the Court DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.