Guice

Guice v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20203:18-cv-06860California6,581 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIELLE G., Case No. 18-cv-06860-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS MOTIONS FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 16, 17 Defendant. 11

12 Plaintiff Danielle G. seeks social security disability benefits for physical and mental 13 impairments caused by Borrelia Hermsii (a tick-borne illness), including paralysis in the hands 14 and feet, vision problems, neurological issues, rapid heart rate, and low cortisol. (Administrative 15 Record (“AR”) 265.) Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), Plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial 16 review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying 17 her application for benefits. (Dkt. No. 1.)1 Now before the Court are Plaintiff’s and Defendant’s 18 motions for summary judgment.2 (Dkt. Nos. 16 & 17.) Because the decision of the 19 Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to deny benefits is supported by substantial evidence and free 20 of legal error, the Court DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.