Tevra Brands LLC v. Bayer HealthCare LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 16, 20205:19-cv-04312California2,324 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 TEVRA BRANDS LLC, Case No. 19-cv-04312-BLF

8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTIONS TO

SEAL FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

10 BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC, et al., AND PLAINTIFF'S REPLY IN

SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE

11 Defendants. TO FILE FIRST AMENDED

COMPLAINT

12 [Re: ECF 78, 87] 13 14 Before the Court are Plaintiff Tevra Brands LLC’s administrative motions to file under 15 seal portions of (1) the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and the red-lined version of the FAC, 16 ECF 78, see also ECF 82; and (2) Plaintiff’s Reply in Support of Its Motion for Leave to File the 17 FAC, ECF 87. Having reviewed the parties’ submissions and applicable sealing law, the Court 18 GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the administrative motions. 19 I. LEGAL STANDARD 20 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 21 and documents, including judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.