Ridgway

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KIRSTIN RIDGWAY, Case No. 18-cv-07822-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S

9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

10 SANDY PHILLIPS, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 49 11 Defendants.

12 13 Pending before the Court is Defendant Sandy Phillips’s motion for summary judgment. 14 Dkt. No. 49. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART AND DENIES IN 15 PART the motion. 16 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 17 Plaintiff Kirstin Ridgway initially filed this action in Sonoma County Superior Court 18 against Defendant Phillips, individually and “doing business as” Soley Performance Limited 19 (“Soley”). See generally Dkt. No. 1-1. Defendant Phillips removed the action to this Court and 20 filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and based on form non conveniens. Dkt. 21 Nos. 1, 7. The Court denied Defendant’s motion, but found that to the extent Plaintiff was 22 attempting to join Soley as a separate…