Naghibolashrafi

Naghibolashrafi v. Pompeo

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20205:19-cv-06602California2,955 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 NARIMAN NAGHIBOLASHRAFI, et al., Case No. 19-cv-06602-NC 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING 12 DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO v. DISMISS 13 MICHAEL R. POMPEO, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 14 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiffs Nariman Naghibolashrafi and Bahareh Hosseini seek mandamus, 18 declaratory, and injunctive relief, alleging that defendants United States Department of 19 State, Federal Bureau of Investigation, and officers in charge of those departments have 20 improperly delayed Hosseini’s visa application. See Dkt. No. 1. Before the Court is 21 Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiffs’ complaint. See Dkt. No. 14. Because the delay 22 is not yet unreasonable, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion to dismiss. 23 I. Background1 24 Naghibolashrafi and Hosseini are married. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl”) ¶ 1. In July 25 2017, Plaintiffs began a visa application for Hosseini, who is an Iranian national living in 26 Tehran, Iran. Id. ¶¶ 2, 9. The United…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.