Scott

Scott v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20204:19-cv-06046California948 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DONNIE SCOTT, Case No. 19-cv-06046-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

COURT TO ORDER UNITED STATES

9 v. MARSHAL TO COMPLETE SERVICE

ON DEFENDANTS KUMAR AND

10 ERIC GOLDING, et al., GOLDING VIA WAIVER OF SERVICE 11 Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 25

12 Petitioner has requested that the Court order the United States Marshal to complete service 13 on defendants Kumar and Golding. Dkt. No. 25. Petitioner states that California Deputy Attorney 14 General (“DAG”) Wilfred Fong has filed a waiver of reply indicating that the defendants waive 15 any deficiencies in service of the summons and complaint. Petitioner therefore requests that the 16 United States Marshal serve defendants’ counsel, DAG Fong, with a waiver of service. Petitioner 17 further states that he has reason to believe that defendants Golding and Kumar have previously 18 accepted service of summons and complaint at Pelican Bay State Prison in C No. 19-cv-01613 19 WHA, Robinson v.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.