Hong Kong uCloudlink Network Technology Limited v. SIMO Holdings Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20203:18-cv-05031California7,565 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HONG KONG UCLOUDLINK Case No. 18-cv-05031-EMC NETWORK TECHNOLOGY LIMITED, et 8 al.,

ORDER RE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION

9 Plaintiffs, Docket Nos. 93, 102, 105 10 v.

11 SIMO HOLDINGS INC., et al.,

12 Defendants.

13 14 15 Plaintiffs (collectively, “UCL”) have sued Defendants (collectively, “SIMO”) for patent 16 infringement. The only patent at issue is UCL’s ‘780 patent. The Court held a Markman hearing 17 on March 10, 2020. This order memorializes the Court’s claim construction on the disputed 18 terms. 19 I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 20 The ‘780 patent is titled “Service sharing system and apparatus.” Context for the patent is 21 provided in the section of the patent titled “Background of the Invention.”

22 At present, almost all the communication terminals, such as mobile phones, data cards, and hotspot devices, are capable of establishing 23 connections with the corresponding service providers or networks using physical Subscriber Identity…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.