Harrison

Harrison v. Wells Fargo Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20203:18-cv-07824California2,544 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PATRINA HARRISON, Plaintiff, No. C 18-07824 WHA

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, et al., ORDER GRANTING

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendants.

15 INTRODUCTION In this race discrimination case, defendant bank moves for summary judgment. Because it offers a legitimate, non-pretextual reason for denial of credit, plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1982, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act fail. And because plaintiff completed all deposits requested of the bank, her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 also fail. For these and the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. STATEMENT On or about June 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Patrina Harrison applied for Wells Fargo’s pre- approval of a one million dollar mortgage on an unspecified two-and-a-half million dollar San Francisco property with an income of approximately thirteen hundred dollars per month and liquid assets…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.