Harrison
Harrison v. Wells Fargo Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PATRINA HARRISON, Plaintiff, No. C 18-07824 WHA
v.
WELLS FARGO BANK, et al., ORDER GRANTING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Defendants.
15 INTRODUCTION In this race discrimination case, defendant bank moves for summary judgment. Because it offers a legitimate, non-pretextual reason for denial of credit, plaintiff’s claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1982, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, and the Fair Housing Act fail. And because plaintiff completed all deposits requested of the bank, her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 also fail. For these and the reasons stated below, the motion is GRANTED. STATEMENT On or about June 4, 2018, pro se plaintiff Patrina Harrison applied for Wells Fargo’s pre- approval of a one million dollar mortgage on an unspecified two-and-a-half million dollar San Francisco property with an income of approximately thirteen hundred dollars per month and liquid assets…