McAleenan

Doe 1 v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20205:18-cv-02349California604 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 JANE DOE 1, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02349-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL

CHAD WOLF, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 305 Defendants.

In connection with the parties’ discovery dispute concerning de-designation (Dkt. No. 306), plaintiffs filed an administrative motion to file portions of the parties’ joint discovery letter brief under seal. Dkt. No. 305. Defendants filed a response pursuant to Civil Local Rule 79- 5(e)(1). Dkt. No. 311. Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court grants the administrative motion, as set forth below. There is a strong presumption in favor of access by the public to judicial records and documents accompanying dispositive motions that can be overcome only by a showing of “compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings.” Kamakana v. City & Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178–79 (9th Cir. 2006) (internal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.