NetFuel, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NETFUEL, INC.,

Case No. 5:18-cv-02352-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION TO STRIKE; GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Re: Dkt. Nos. 256, 258 Defendant.

The Parties have filed motions to exclude portions of the opposing sides’ expert testimony. The Court finds these motions suitable for consideration without oral argument. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having considered the Parties’ papers, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion to strike portions of Dr. Almeroth’s expert reports and GRANTS Defendant’s motion to strike portions of Dr. Rubin and Mr. Bratic’s expert reports.1 I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background Plaintiff alleges that Defendant infringed two of its patents. The Patents-in-Suit—U.S. Patent Nos. 7,747,730 (the “’730…