Malley

Malley v. San Jose Midtown Development LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 19, 20205:20-cv-01925California1,067 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6

GREGORY MALLEY,

7 Case No. 5:20-cv-01925-EJD Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY 9 RESTRAINING ORDER

SAN JOSE MIDTOWN DEVELOPMENT

10 LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 2 11 Defendants.

12 On March 19, 2020, Plaintiff Gregory Malley filed a motion for a temporary restraining 13 order against Defendants San Jose Midtown Development LLC (“SJMD”), Sangeeth Peruri, and 14 Thomas Malgesini. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (“TRO Mot.”), Dkt. No. 2. On 15 March 19, 2020, the case was reassigned to the undersigned. Dkt. No. 8. For the reasons 16 discussed below, the Court DENIES the motion. 17 This case arises under California contract law and federal civil RICO (18 U.S.C. § 1964). 18 Defendant Peruri leads an investment consortium that holds a majority stake in SJMD. TRO Mot. 19 at 6. Defendant Malgesini…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.