Silverman

Quality Investment Group, Inc. v. Silverman

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20203:20-cv-01239California1,088 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 QUALITY INVESTMENT GROUP, INC., Case No. 20-cv-01239-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

9 v. MOTION TO REMAND; AND

FINDING MOOT PLAINTIFF’S

10 GARY B. SILVERMAN, et al., MOTION TO EXPEDITE 11 Defendants. Docket Nos. 11, 13

12 13 Plaintiff Quality Investment Group, Inc. initiated this action in state court. The operative 14 complaint (the second amended complaint) named multiple individuals as defendants, including 15 Cynthia Gawley-Uy. Ms. Gawley-Uy removed the case from state to federal court on February 16 19, 2020. Currently pending before the Court is Quality’s motion to remand the action back to 17 state court. The Court hereby GRANTS Quality’s motion. 18 As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that Ms. Gawley-Uy has moved for a continuance 19 – implicitly, a continuance of both the hearing date and her time to file an opposition to the motion 20 to remand. The motion to continue the hearing date is moot because the Court is hereby…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.