Preciado

Preciado v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20201:18-cv-07107California3,522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 JUAN M. PRECIADO, Case No. 18-cv-07107-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 27, 30 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) decision denying his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. On May 1, 2015, Plaintiff filed his applications for disability benefits alleging an onset date of December 31, 2008. See Administrative Record1 (“AR”) (dkt. 16) at 20. The ALJ denied the applications on November 20, 2017. Id. at 31. Plaintiff’s request for review was denied by the Appeals Council on September 17, 2018 (id. at 1-6), and thus, the ALJ’s decision is the “final decision” of the Commissioner of Social Security which this court may review. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)(3). Both parties have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.