Bain

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DAVID BAIN, et al., Case No. 15-cv-03305-EMC

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

9 v. MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES

AND NONTAXABLE EXPENSES

10 OXFORD HEALTH INSURANCE INC, et al., Docket No. 116 11 Defendants. 12 13 14 Plaintiffs are David and Dayna Bain and their daughter Alaina Bain. They filed suit 15 against the plan administrator for their health insurance plan – i.e., Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. 16 and its affiliate United Behavioral Health (collectively, “UBH”) – after UBH denied a claim 17 submitted by the Bains for Alaina. UBH found that the services at issue were not medically 18 necessary. 19 The parties filed cross-motions for judgment. In February 2020, the Court granted in part 20 and denied in part Plaintiffs’ motion and denied UBH’s motion. See generally Docket No. 108 21 (order). The Court found that UBH abused its discretion in denying the Bains’ claim for benefits 22 but did not award the Bains the full relief they…