Matos

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 HILDA M.,1 Case No. 19-cv-02505-TSH

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 13, 14 11 Defendant.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Hilda M. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial 15 review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, 16 denying her claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions 17 for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 13 (Pl.’s Mot.), 14 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 18 16-5, the motions have been submitted on the papers without oral argument. Having reviewed the 19 parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court 20 hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and REMANDS for 21 further proceedings consistent with this Order. 22 …