Alva

Alva v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20204:18-cv-04502California3,161 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 NANCY DIANE ALVA, Case No. 18-cv-04502-KAW

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S 9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT; GRANTING

10 NANCY A BERRYHILL, DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 22 12 13 Plaintiff Nancy Diane Alva seeks judicial review, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of the 14 Commissioner’s final decision, and the remand of this case for payment of benefits, or, in the 15 alternative, for further proceedings. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and Defendant’s 17 cross-motion for summary judgment. Having considered the papers filed by the parties, and for 18 the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and 19 GRANTS Defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiff filed for Title II benefits on June 23, 2014. (Administrative Record (“AR”) 219.) 22 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.