Castaneda

Castaneda v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20204:18-cv-07363California3,003 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ATHZIRI CASTANEDA, Case No. 18-cv-07363-DMR

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 28 Defendant.

Plaintiff Athziri Castaneda moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which found Castaneda no longer disabled due to medical improvement and therefore terminated her disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket No. 22.] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 28.] For the reasons stated below, the court grants in part Castaneda’s motion and remands this matter for further proceedings. I. BACKGROUND On October 3, 2012, Castaneda was found disabled beginning on October 3, 2012. This is known as the “comparison point decision” or CPD. Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 16. At the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.