Castaneda
Castaneda v. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ATHZIRI CASTANEDA, Case No. 18-cv-07363-DMR
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR
9 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 22, 28 11 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Athziri Castaneda moves for summary judgment to reverse the Commissioner of 13 the Social Security Administration’s (the “Commissioner’s”) final administrative decision, which 14 found Castaneda no longer disabled due to medical improvement and therefore terminated her 15 disability benefits under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. [Docket 16 No. 22.] The Commissioner cross-moves to affirm. [Docket No. 28.] For the reasons stated 17 below, the court grants in part Castaneda’s motion and remands this matter for further 18 proceedings. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On October 3, 2012, Castaneda was found disabled beginning on October 3, 2012. This is 21 known as the “comparison point decision” or CPD. Administrative Record (“A.R.”) 16. At the…