Miller v. Peter Thomas Roth, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KARI MILLER, et al., Plaintiffs, No. C 19-00698 WHA

v.

ORDER GRANTING

PETER THOMAS ROTH, LLC, et al., RECONSIDERATION AND

DENYING SUMMARY

Defendants.

JUDGMENT

15 16 INTRODUCTION After largely defeating defendants’ motion for summary judgment in this deceptive cosmetics advertising case, plaintiff moves the Court to reconsider an issue resolved in defendants’ favor and now herself moves for summary judgment. The motion to reconsider is GRANTED. But triable issues still remain, so the motion for summary judgment is DENIED. STATEMENT A prior order details the facts of this case (Dkt. No. 104). In brief, defendants Peter Thomas Roth, Designs, Global, and Labs LLC (“PTR Labs”) market specialty skincare products and plaintiff Kari Miller contends PTR Labs falsely and deceptively advertised that the hyaluronic acid contained in its Water Drench line could attract and retain up to…