Holden

Johnson v. Holden

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20205:18-cv-01624California3,828 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

SCOTT JOHNSON,

8 Case No. 5:18-cv-01624-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 10 JUDGMENT; DENYING MOTION FOR DONALD B. HOLDEN, et al., SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 51 s . 13 Plaintiff Scott Johnson alleges that Defendants Donald Holden, Elizabeth Holden, and

14 || Terra Bella Group, Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Having © 3 15 considered the Parties’ briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument on October 10, 2019, the Q 16 || Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and DENIES Defendants’ motion

17 || for sanctions. 18 I. | BACKGROUND 19 A. Factual Background 20 On May 15, 2018, Plaintiff, a level C-5 quadriplegic, filed a lawsuit against Defendants, 21 who operate a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.