Holden

Johnson v. Holden

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 18, 20205:18-cv-01624California3,828 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

SCOTT JOHNSON,

Case No. 5:18-cv-01624-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING MOTION FOR DONALD B. HOLDEN, et al., SANCTIONS Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 51 s . Plaintiff Scott Johnson alleges that Defendants Donald Holden, Elizabeth Holden, and

|| Terra Bella Group, Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). Having © considered the Parties’ briefs and having had the benefit of oral argument on October 10, 2019, the Q 16 || Court GRANTS Defendants’ motion for summary judgment and DENIES Defendants’ motion

17 || for sanctions. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual Background On May 15, 2018, Plaintiff, a level C-5 quadriplegic, filed a lawsuit against Defendants, who operate a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.