Bradley

Bradley v. County of Sonoma

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 23, 20204:19-cv-07464California2,029 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 RANDI BRADLEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07464-KAW

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendants.

12 Plaintiffs Randi Bradley and A.B. filed the instant suit against Defendants, asserting that Defendants violated their civil rights. (Compl. ¶ 1, Dkt. No. 1.) Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff A.B.’s state law claims. (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 19.) The Court deemed this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and vacated the March 19, 2020 hearing. (Dkt. No. 28.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege that in October 2018, Defendants failed to conduct a proper investigation as to alleged sex abuse, resulting in Defendants improperly removing Plaintiff A.B. from Plaintiff Bradley’s home for twenty days. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.