Bradley
Bradley v. County of Sonoma
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RANDI BRADLEY, et al., Case No. 19-cv-07464-KAW
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO
9 v. DISMISS
10 COUNTY OF SONOMA, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 19 11 Defendants.
12 13 Plaintiffs Randi Bradley and A.B. filed the instant suit against Defendants, asserting that 14 Defendants violated their civil rights. (Compl. ¶ 1, Dkt. No. 1.) Pending before the Court is 15 Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff A.B.’s state law claims. (Defs.’ Mot. to Dismiss, Dkt. No. 16 19.) 17 The Court deemed this matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and vacated the 18 March 19, 2020 hearing. (Dkt. No. 28.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES 19 Defendants’ motion. 20 I. BACKGROUND 21 Plaintiffs allege that in October 2018, Defendants failed to conduct a proper investigation 22 as to alleged sex abuse, resulting in Defendants improperly removing Plaintiff A.B. from Plaintiff 23 Bradley’s home for twenty days. …