Stuckey
Stuckey v. Trump
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3
ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY,
4 Case No. 19-cv-03688-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 5 ORDER CERTIFYING THAT v. PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL IS NOT IN 6 GOOD FAITH UNDER 28 U.S.C. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., § 1915(A)(3) Defendants. 8 9 This closed federal civil rights action was filed by a pro se state prisoner. On January 29, 10 || 2020, the Court issued its Order of Dismissal and entered judgment. Dkts. 14, 15. On March 2, 11 || 2020, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal from the Court’s January 29, 2020 Order. Dkt. 16. a 12 The Ninth Circuit has referred the matter to this Court for a determination whether
13 || Plaintiff's in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status should continue for this appeal. Dkt. 18. This Court
v 14 || determines that it should not. There are no valid grounds on which an appeal can be based. © 15 || Consequently, the Court certifies that any appeal taken…