Stuckey

Stuckey v. Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20204:19-cv-03688California336 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3

ANDRE KENNETH STUCKEY,

4 Case No. 19-cv-03688-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 5 ORDER CERTIFYING THAT v. PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL IS NOT IN 6 GOOD FAITH UNDER 28 U.S.C. DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., § 1915(A)(3) Defendants. 8 9 This closed federal civil rights action was filed by a pro se state prisoner. On January 29, 10 || 2020, the Court issued its Order of Dismissal and entered judgment. Dkts. 14, 15. On March 2, 11 || 2020, Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal from the Court’s January 29, 2020 Order. Dkt. 16. a 12 The Ninth Circuit has referred the matter to this Court for a determination whether

13 || Plaintiff's in forma pauperis (“IFP”) status should continue for this appeal. Dkt. 18. This Court

v 14 || determines that it should not. There are no valid grounds on which an appeal can be based. © 15 || Consequently, the Court certifies that any appeal taken…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.