Richter

Richter v. Ausmus

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 24, 20203:19-cv-08300-WHOCalifornia6,729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JULIA RICHTER, Case No. 19-cv-08300-WHO

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' v. MOTION TO DISMISS

LISA AUSMUS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 18 Defendants.

Plaintiff Julia Richter, an officer with the Oakland Police Department (“OPD”), brings this action pro se against OPD employees Lisa Ausmus, Todd Mork, Sekou Millington, Anne Kirkpatrick, Damon Gilbert, and Bryan Hubbard. She alleges multiple causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 stemming from defendants’ alleged failure to properly train defensive tactics, which caused her injury, and defendants’ wrongful investigations in retaliation for her pursuit of disability benefits and her testimony in federal court. She also brings causes of action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986 and California law. There are a number of problems with Richter’s Amended Complaint. This Order identifies in what ways Richter has failed to state any cause of action and allows…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.