Caces-Tiamson

Caces-Tiamson v. Equifax

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 20, 20203:20-cv-00387California2,612 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MARIA ASELA CACES-TIAMSON, Case No. 20-cv-00387-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

9 v. MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF

PERSONAL JURISDICTION

10 EQUIFAX, Docket No. 7 11 Defendant.

12 13 14 Plaintiff Maria Asela Caces-Tiamson, proceeding pro se, has filed suit against Defendant 15 Equifax. The suit is related to a data breach that occurred at Equifax and that the company 16 announced in September 2017. Currently pending before the Court is Equifax’s motion to dismiss 17 for lack of personal jurisdiction and to dismiss for failure to state a claim for relief. 18 Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, the Court finds this 19 matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and thus VACATES the hearing on the 20 motion. Equifax’s motion to dismiss based on lack of personal jurisdiction is hereby GRANTED. 21 I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 22 Although Ms. Caces-Tiamson’s complaint is not a model of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.