Plexxikon Inc. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20204:17-cv-04405California3,368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 PLEXXIKON INC., Case No. 17-cv-04405-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF DR.

v. MICHAEL L. METZKER

NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS Re: Dkt. No. 200

CORPORATION,

11 Defendant. 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation’s motion to exclude the testimony of Plaintiff Plexxikon Inc.’s expert Dr. Michael L. Metzker. See Dkt. No. 200. The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2019. Dkt. No. 337. For the reasons detailed below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND Issues of patent invalidity and infringement are determined from the perspective of a person of ordinary skill in the art (“POSITA”) in the field of the claimed invention. See, e.g., Sundance, Inc. v. DeMonte Fabricating Ltd., 550 F.3d 1356, 1361, n.3 (Fed. Cir. 2008). Despite the parties’ myriad disagreements in this action, they appear to agree that in this case the pertinent art is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.