Mitek Systems, Inc. v. United Services Automobile Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20203:19-cv-07223California1,046 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MITEK SYSTEMS, INC., Case No. 19-cv-07223-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL

9 v. BRIEFING

10 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE

ASSOCIATION,

11 Docket No. 19 Defendant. 12

13 14 15 Plaintiff Mitek Systems, Inc. seeks a declaration that it does not infringe four patents (the 16 ‘779, ‘517, ‘090, and ‘571 patents) held by Defendant United States Automobile Association 17 (“USAA”). Currently pending before the Court is USAA’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject 18 matter jurisdiction – more specifically, on the basis that there is no case or controversy between 19 the parties. In the alternative, USAA asks that the Court transfer the instant case to the Eastern 20 District of Texas pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Having considered the parties’ briefs and 21 accompanying submissions, the Court hereby orders the parties to provide supplemental briefing 22 on the issue discussed below. The supplemental briefs shall be filed within one week of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.