NetFuel, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20205:18-cv-02352California1,141 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

NETFUEL, INC.,

Case No. 5:18-cv-02352-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 304 Defendant. 1] Ss On March 10, 2020, this Court granted Defendant’s motion to strike portions of □□□□□□□□□□ □ expert reports. See Dkt. 293; see also Dkt. 301 (public unsealed copy of order). In this order, the

|| Court declined to allow Plaintiff leave to file supplemental expert reports. Plaintiff argues this © || was an error and that its motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration should be granted. 16 || NetFuel, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration (“Recon. Mot.”), Dkt. 304.

|| The Court disagrees. Plaintiff has not presented adequate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.