NetFuel, Inc. v. Cisco Systems Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6
NETFUEL, INC.,
7 Case No. 5:18-cv-02352-EJD Plaintiff, 8 ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE 9 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
CISCO SYSTEMS INC.,
10 Re: Dkt. No. 304 Defendant. 1] Ss 12 On March 10, 2020, this Court granted Defendant’s motion to strike portions of □□□□□□□□□□ □ 13 expert reports. See Dkt. 293; see also Dkt. 301 (public unsealed copy of order). In this order, the
14 || Court declined to allow Plaintiff leave to file supplemental expert reports. Plaintiff argues this © 3 15 || was an error and that its motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration should be granted. 16 || NetFuel, Inc.’s Motion for Leave to File Motion for Reconsideration (“Recon. Mot.”), Dkt. 304.
17 || The Court disagrees. Plaintiff has not presented adequate…