Bautista

Bautista v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20203:18-cv-07693California7,874 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

ANTONIO BAUTISTA,

7 Case No. 18-cv-07693-JCS Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY 9 JUDGMENT, DENYING

ANDREW SAUL, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

10 SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND Defendant. REMANDING FOR AWARD OF 11 BENEFITS

12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19

13 14 I. INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Antonio Bautista brings this action appealing the final decision of Defendant 16 Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”)1 denying Bautista’s 17 application for disability benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties 18 have filed cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5. For the 19 reasons discussed below, Bautista’s motion is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s motion is 20 DENIED, and the matter is REMANDED for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.