Deisenroth
Deisenroth v. Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT D. DEISENROTH, Case No. 19-cv-00614-WHO
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
9 v. JUDGEMENTAND DENYING
DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, SUMMARY JUDGEMENT;
REMANDING FOR PAYMENT OF
11 Defendant. BENEFITS
12 Re: Dkt. No. 18, 25, 26
13 The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgement in this Social Security appeal. 14 Based upon my review of the parties’ papers and the administrative record, I GRANT plaintiff 15 Scott D. Deisenroth’s motion, DENY the Commissioner’s motion, and REMAND this case for a 16 calculation and award of benefits. 17 BACKGROUND 18 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 19 Scott D. Deisenroth applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits 20 under Title II of the Social Security Act on December 23, 2015. Administrative Record (“AR”) 21 18. He initially claimed an onset date of…