Deisenroth

Deisenroth v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 26, 20203:19-cv-00614California10,516 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SCOTT D. DEISENROTH, Case No. 19-cv-00614-WHO

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

9 v. JUDGEMENTAND DENYING

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

10 NANCY A. BERRYHILL, SUMMARY JUDGEMENT;

REMANDING FOR PAYMENT OF

11 Defendant. BENEFITS

12 Re: Dkt. No. 18, 25, 26

13 The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgement in this Social Security appeal. 14 Based upon my review of the parties’ papers and the administrative record, I GRANT plaintiff 15 Scott D. Deisenroth’s motion, DENY the Commissioner’s motion, and REMAND this case for a 16 calculation and award of benefits. 17 BACKGROUND 18 I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 19 Scott D. Deisenroth applied for Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) benefits 20 under Title II of the Social Security Act on December 23, 2015. Administrative Record (“AR”) 21 18. He initially claimed an onset date of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.