Che
Che v. GFROERER, A California limited partnership
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 NGOC LAM CHE, Case No. 19-cv-06891-VKD Plaintiff,
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
GFROERER, Defendant.
v Plaintiff Ngoc Lam Che filed the present action on October 23, 2019. Dkt. No. 1. O || Pursuant to General Order 56, the parties’ last day to conduct a joint site inspection was February Q 16 || 5, 2020 and Mr. Che’s last day to file a notice of need for mediation was March 18, 2020. Dkt.
|| No.5. Mr. Che did not file a notice of need for mediation, nor did he seek relief from the March
18 || 18 deadline. The Court possesses the inherent power to dismiss an action sua sponte “to achieve the || orderly and expeditious disposition of cases.” Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962). Mr. Che is directed to file a written response to this order by April 3, 2020 and show || cause why this action…