Troy A. Ocampo V. Nancy A . Berryhill
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 T.O.,1 Case No. 18-cv-04313-JCS
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING CROSS
9 v. MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
10 ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 29 Defendant. 11
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff T.O. brings this action challenging the final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, 15 Commissioner of Social Security, (the “Commissioner”) denying T.O.’s application for disability 16 benefits after a hearing before an administrative law judge (the “ALJ”). The parties filed cross 17 motions for summary judgment pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5.2 For the reasons discussed 18 below, T.O.’s motion is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s motion is DENIED, and the matter is 19 REMANDED for further administrative proceedings consistent with this order.3 20 II. BACKGROUND 21 T.O. filed his application for disability benefits on December 18, 2014, alleging a disability 22 onset date of October 1, 2014. See Admin. Record (“AR,” dkt. 13) at 15 (ALJ’s decision, 23 1 Because opinions…