WhatsApp Inc. v. NSO Group Technologies Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 25, 20204:19-cv-07123California866 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6

7 WHATSAPP INC., et al., Case No. 19-cv-07123-PJH 8 Plaintiffs,

9 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO SET

10 NSO GROUP TECHNOLOGIES ASIDE DEFAULT JUDGMENT; LIMITED, et al., DENYING MOTION TO AUTHORIZE 11 ALTERNATIVE SERVICE Defendants. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 24, 29

13 14 Before the court is defendants NSO Group Technologies Limited (“NSO”) and Q 15 Cyber Technologies Limited’s (“Q Cyber” and together with NSO, “defendants”) motion to 16 set aside default. Dkt. 24. Also before the court is WhatsApp Inc. (“WhatsApp”) and 17 Facebook, Inc.’s (“Facebook” and together with WhatsApp, “plaintiffs”) cross-motion for 18 alternative service. Dkt. 29. The matters are fully briefed and suitable for decision 19 without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for April 16, 2020 is VACATED. 20 Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the 21 relevant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.