Coleman
Coleman v. Boessenecker
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WENDELL COLEMAN, Case No. 20-cv-01535-JSC
Plaintiff,
SECTION 1915 SCREENING OF
v. COMPLAINT; REQUESTS FOR
INTERIM RELIEF
MARK BOESSENECKER, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 5, 6 Defendants.
Wendell Coleman sues 32 Napa County employees and officials for alleged violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. (Dkt. No. 6.) Having granted Mr. Coleman’s application to proceed in forma pauperis, (see Dkt. No. 8), the Court now screens his amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and concludes that the complaint is deficient for the reasons stated below. COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS The complaint does not contain a plain statement of facts and allegations. It instead consists of a litany of grievances alleging various abuses by Napa County judges, district attorneys, public defenders, law enforcement personnel, corrections officers and staff, probation …