Ramirez

Ramirez v. City Of Gilroy

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 27, 20205:17-cv-00625California5,240 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ALMA RAMIREZ, et al., Case No. 17-cv-00625-VKD

9 Plaintiffs,

PRETRIAL ORDER RE MOTIONS IN

10 v. LIMINE AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO BIFURCATE LIABILITY AND

11 CITY OF GILROY, et al., DAMAGES 12 Defendants.

13 14 The Court held a pretrial conference in this matter on February 26, 2020. Dkt. No. 115. 15 This order resolves the parties’ motions in limine and plaintiffs’ conditional motion to bifurcate 16 liability and damages (Dkt. Nos. 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 81). The 17 Court will issue separate orders regarding the parties’ proposed jury instructions (Dkt. No. 94) and 18 other matters discussed during the pretrial conference. 19 I. MOTIONS IN LIMINE 20 The Court resolves the parties’ motions in limine as follows: 21 A. Plaintiffs’ Motion in Limine No. 1 (Tattoos/Gang Affiliation) 22 Plaintiffs move to exclude any evidence that refers to Mr. Alvarez’s tattoos…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.