Rivas Rosales v. Barr
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JOSE GABRIEL RIVAS ROSALES, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00888-EMC
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
v. INJUNCTION, AND DENYING
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR
WILLIAM P. BARR, et al., JUDICIAL NOTICE Defendants. Docket Nos. 4,
12 13 I. INTRODUCTION Petitioners, Jose Gabriel Rivas Rosales, Reyna Romero Lopez, and their minor child E.R.R. (hereinafter, collectively, “Petitioners”), seek a preliminary injunction staying the use of Video Teleconferencing (“VTC”) in their asylum case now before an Immigration Judge,1 pending a decision on their petition to this Court for a Writ of Mandamus. That Writ asks that this Court “enjoin Respondents from utilizing Video-Teleconference . . . against the non-detained Petitioners.” Respondents, William P. Barr and James McHenry, are being sued in their official capacities as the Attorney General of the Department of Justice…