Williams v. Apple, Inc.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11

12 ANDREA M WILLIAMS, et al., Case No. 19-CV-04700-LHK

13 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART APPLE’S

14 v.

MOTION TO DISMISS

15 APPLE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 15 16 Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiffs bring this putative class action against Defendant Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) and 19 allege breach of contract, violations of California’s False Advertising Law (“FAL”), and violations 20 of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”). ECF No. 1 (“Class Action Complaint” or 21 “CAC”). Before the Court is Apple’s motion to dismiss. ECF No. 15. Having considered the 22 submissions of the parties, the relevant law, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS in part 23 and DENIES in part Apple’s motion to dismiss. 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 A. Factual Background 26 Apple is a corporation incorporated under the laws of California and has its principal place 27 of business in Cupertino, California. CAC ¶ 7. Apple provides cloud storage services…