Bearden

Bearden v. Alameda County

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20203:19-cv-04264California5,048 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 JEROME BEARDEN, Case No. 19-cv-04264-SI

7 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 8 v. MOTION TO DISMISS

9 ALAMEDA COUNTY, 10 Defendant.

11 12 On December 26, 2019, Defendant County of Alameda filed the instant motion to dismiss 13 plaintiff’s second amended complaint1 (“SAC”) for failure to state a claim. Dkt. No. 20 (Motion to 14 Dismiss). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b) the Court hereby vacates the March 20, 2020, hearing 15 and the motion is hereby GRANTED. 16 17 BACKGROUND 18 Plaintiff Jerome Bearden is a Juvenile Institutional Officer at the County of Alameda’s 19 Juvenile Justice Center, located at 2500 Fairmont Drive, San Leandro, CA. Dkt. No. 15 ¶¶ 5-6 20 (SAC)2. The SAC alleges that on July 10, 2018, Mr. Bearden emailed his colleague, Juvenile 21 Institutional Officer Christine Bernal, requesting she cease re-creating unit population sheets if she 22 found mistakes because the night shift is responsible for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.