Leventhal, M.D. v. Jackson National Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20203:19-cv-02123California2,049 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LAWRENCE LEVENTHAL, Case No. 19-cv-02123-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE REMAND

v. 9 Re: Dkt. No. 21 10 JACKSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 13 Plaintiff Lawrence Leventhal originally filed this case in the California Superior Court 14 after Jackson National Life Insurance Company (“Jackson National”) denied his claim for benefits 15 under disability insurance policies. The action alleges claims for breach of contract and bad faith 16 against Jackson National, and for a writ of mandate against the Commissioner of the California 17 Department of Insurance. Jackson National removed the complaint on diversity grounds. Dkt. 18 No. 1. Leventhal asks to remand the case back to the state court, and for costs and fees. Dkt. No. 19 21. 20 The Court took the matter under submission on the written papers, Dkt. No. 31; Civil L.R. 21 7-1(b), and finds that the case was removed improvidently and without jurisdiction. It is 22 remanded to the Superior Court for the City and County of San…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.