Silverman

Silverman v. Napa State Hospital

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20205:18-cv-07620California1,553 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JACOB S. SILVERMAN,

11 Case No. 18-07620 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER OF SERVICE; DIRECTING

DEFENDANTS TO FILE

v. 13 DISPOSITIVE MOTION OR

NOTICE REGARDING SUCH

14 NAPA STATE HOSPITAL, et al., MOTION; INSTRUCTIONS TO

CLERK

15 Defendant.

16

17 18 Plaintiff, a California inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Napa State Hospital (“NHS”) for inhumane conditions. The 20 Court twice dismissed the complaint with leave to amend for Plaintiff to name a proper 21 defendant for this action to proceed. Dkt. Nos. 7, 10. Plaintiff has filed an amendment, 22 naming two individuals as defendants. Dkt. No. 12. 23 24 DISCUSSION 25 A. Standard of Review 26 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a 27 prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a 1 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.