Postpichal

Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20203:19-cv-07270California5,733 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERMAINE THOMAS, JERMAINE

MILLER, JAMIE POSTPICHAL,

RONALD ELLISON, SARAH WATERS, No. C 19-07270 WHA

KAMILAH RIDDICK, FELICIA

RIDDICK, TIARA CROMWELL, LYSHA

ENCARNACION, LANI HALE, MELIZZA

WEAVER, ALFREDO SANCHEZ, and ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS CLARISSA KELLY, on behalf of OR TRANSFER themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.

CRICKET WIRELESS LLC, Defendant.

19 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, defendant moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, or to transfer venue. For the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The claims in the first-amended complaint, our operative complaint, all stem from allegations that Defendant Cricket Wireless, LLC, engaged in a marketing scheme touting nationwide, unlimited 4G/LTE coverage, despite Cricket knowing that its service fell far short of providing 4G/LTE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.