Postpichal
Postpichal v. Cricket Wireless, LLC
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 31, 20203:19-cv-07270California5,733 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JERMAINE THOMAS, JERMAINE
MILLER, JAMIE POSTPICHAL,
RONALD ELLISON, SARAH WATERS, No. C 19-07270 WHA
KAMILAH RIDDICK, FELICIA
RIDDICK, TIARA CROMWELL, LYSHA
ENCARNACION, LANI HALE, MELIZZA
WEAVER, ALFREDO SANCHEZ, and ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS CLARISSA KELLY, on behalf of OR TRANSFER themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v.
CRICKET WIRELESS LLC, Defendant.
19 INTRODUCTION In this putative class action, defendant moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and improper venue, or to transfer venue. For the reasons stated below, the motion is DENIED. STATEMENT The claims in the first-amended complaint, our operative complaint, all stem from allegations that Defendant Cricket Wireless, LLC, engaged in a marketing scheme touting nationwide, unlimited 4G/LTE coverage, despite Cricket knowing that its service fell far short of providing 4G/LTE…