Just Goods, Inc. v. Just, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20203:18-cv-02198California2,563 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JUST GOODS, INC., Case No. 3:18-cv-02198-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

9 v. ENFORCE COMPLIANCE WITH

TERM SHEET

10 JUST, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 133, 134, 136, 138 Defendants. 11

12 13 This case, which settled in August 2019, involved a trademark dispute and the allegedly 14 justified breach of a contract intended to avoid that same dispute. After a hearing on summary 15 judgment before me and a day-long settlement conference with Chief Magistrate Judge Joseph C. 16 Spero, plaintiff Just Goods, Inc. (“JGI”) and defendants Just, Inc. fka Hampton Creek, Inc. and 17 founder Joshua Tetrick agreed to a binding Term Sheet. Before me is JGI’s motion to enforce that 18 agreement on the grounds that the defendant—now officially known as Eat JUST, Inc. (“EJ”)— 19 has failed to comply with its terms in two respects. As set forth below, I agree and will order EJ to 20 comply with the terms of the settlement. 21 BACKGROUND 22 In…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.