Finjan, LLC. v. Cisco Systems Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20205:17-cv-00072California11,927 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

Redacted 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 FINJAN, INC., Case No. 17-cv-00072-BLF 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART CISCO’S MOTION

9 v. FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY

JUDGMENT OF NON-

10 CISCO SYSTEMS INC., INFRINGEMENT 11 Defendant. [Re: ECF 378] 12 Plaintiff Finjan, Inc. (“Finjan”) brings this patent infringement lawsuit against Defendant 13 Cisco Systems, Inc. (“Cisco”), alleging infringement of five of Finjan’s patents directed to computer 14 and network security: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,154,844 (the “’844 Patent”); 6,804,780 (the “’780 patent”); 15 7,647,633 (the “’633 patent”); 8,141,154 (the “’154 patent”); and 8,677,494 (the “’494 patent”). 16 Cisco seeks summary judgment of non-infringement on 3 of the 5 asserted patents: the ’154 Patent, 17 the ’633 Patent, and the ’780 Patent. Cisco also seeks summary judgment of no pre-suit damages. 18 The Court heard oral arguments on January 9, 2020 (the “Hearing”). 19

I. THE…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.