Sullivan
Sullivan v. Storer Transit Systems
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 FATIMA SULLIVAN, Case No. 20-cv-00143-JCS
Plaintiff,
ORDER REGARDING MOTION TO
v. DISMISS AND STRIKE
STORER TRANSIT SYSTEMS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendants.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Fatima Sullivan brings this action against Defendant Storer Transit Systems (“Storer”) asserting disability discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and related claims under California law. Storer moves to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), and moves to strike portions of Sullivan’s complaint under Rule 12(f). The Court finds the matter suitable for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing set for April 3, 2020. For the reasons discussed below, Storer’s motion is DENIED with respect to Rule 12(b)(1) and Rule 12(f) but GRANTED with respect to Rule 12(b)(6), and …