Camilo
Camilo v. Ozuna
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 RODRIGO CAMILO, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02842-VKD
9 Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE FINAL APPROVAL OF
10 v. CLASS SETTLEMENT
11 SEVERO C. OZUNA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 64, 65 Defendants. 12
13 14 I. BACKGROUND 15 Plaintiffs Rodrigo Camilo, Alvaro Camilo, Ricardo Sanchez, and Jose Lopez filed this 16 hybrid class action and collective action for alleged wage and hour violations under various 17 provisions of the California Labor Code and the federal Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 18 U.S.C. § 201, et seq. Defendants are Severo C. Ozuna and the Don Vito Ozuna Food Corporation. 19 In their complaint, plaintiffs alleged that defendants “shaved” work hours from their 20 paychecks on a regular basis, with the result that plaintiffs were not paid minimum wages and 21 were not compensated for all the overtime hours they worked (or, if they were paid, plaintiffs 22 claim that they were compensated for overtime at the regular rate of…