Lucus

Lucus v. Koenig

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20205:19-cv-07938California558 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

JESSE LUCAS,

11 Case No. 19-07938 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA

v. 13 PAUPERIS; GRANTING

PERMISSION FOR ELECTRONIC

14 CRAIG KOENIG, et al., CASE FILING; GRANTING LEAVE

TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT

15 Defendants.

16 (Docket Nos. 6, 12, 14) 17

18 Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), is GRANTED.1 Dkt. No. 19 12. The total filing fee that ultimately will be due is $350.00. In view of Plaintiff’s lack of 20 income, no initial fee is due at this time. The previous IFP motion is DENIED as moot. 21 Dkt. No. 6. 22 Plaintiff has filed a motion for permission for electronic case filing. Dkt. No. 14. 23 Plaintiff states that he has reviewed the requirements for e-filing and agrees to abide by 24 them, and that he has regular access to the technical requirements necessary to e-file 25 successfully. Id. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.