Plata

Plata v. Newsom

Bad Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20204:01-cv-01351California525 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTS 2 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 AND THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT COMPOSED OF THREE JUDGES 5 PURSUANT TO SECTION 2284, TITLE 28 UNITED STATES CODE 6 7 RALPH COLEMAN, et al., Case No. 2:90-cv-0520 KJM DB P

8 Plaintiffs, THREE-JUDGE COURT 9 v.

10 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 MARCIANO PLATA, et al., Case No. 01-cv-01351-JST 13 Plaintiff, THREE-JUDGE COURT 14 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

INTERVENE BY VALLEY FEVER

15 GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., PRISONERS 16 Defendants.

17 18 Now before the Court is the motion to intervene brought by certain prisoners1 with Valley 19 Fever. ECF No. 3229/6542.2 The Court invited Plaintiffs and Defendants to submit responses to 20 the motion by 12:00 noon on April 1, 2020. ECF No. 3247/6556 at 1–2. No response was 21 received. The Court denies the motion for the reasons set forth below. 22 Federal Rule of Civil…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.