Bronson-v-Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10 ALEXIS BRONSON and CRYSTAL HARDIN, on behalf of themselves and all 11 others similarly situated, No. C 18-02300 WHA
12 Plaintiff,
13 v.
ORDER ON MOTION FOR
ATTORNEY'S FEES AND FOR 14 SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS INC., and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 CO., LTD., 16 Defendants.
17 18 INTRODUCTION 19 In this class action certified under Rule 23(b)(2), plaintiff moves for final approval of a 20 settlement agreement and for attorney’s fees, costs, and incentive award. Defendant does not 21 oppose. To the extent stated below, the motion for final approval of the class settlement is 22 GRANTED. The motion for attorney’s fees, costs, and incentive award is GRANTED IN PART. 23 STATEMENT 24 Prior orders set forth the background of this action (see, e.g., Dkt. No. 230). In brief, 25 plaintiffs Alexis Bronson and Crystal Hardin purchased Samsung plasma televisions in 2013 26 that had…