Bronson-v-Samsung Electronics America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaMarch 30, 20203:18-cv-02300California3,660 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALEXIS BRONSON and CRYSTAL HARDIN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, No. C 18-02300 WHA

Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER ON MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY'S FEES AND FOR SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS INC., and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS ACTION SETTLEMENT CO., LTD., Defendants.

17 INTRODUCTION In this class action certified under Rule 23(b)(2), plaintiff moves for final approval of a settlement agreement and for attorney’s fees, costs, and incentive award. Defendant does not oppose. To the extent stated below, the motion for final approval of the class settlement is GRANTED. The motion for attorney’s fees, costs, and incentive award is GRANTED IN PART. STATEMENT Prior orders set forth the background of this action (see, e.g., Dkt. No. 230). In brief, plaintiffs Alexis Bronson and Crystal Hardin purchased Samsung plasma televisions in 2013 that had…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.