State of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Case No. 19-cv-04975-PJH 8 Plaintiffs, Case No. 19-cv-04980-PJH
9 v.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
10 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SECURITY, et al., COMPLETE THE RECORD AND 11 GRANTING MOTIONS TO COMPEL Defendants. DISCOVERY 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 149 (No. 19-cv-04975- 13 PJH), 150 (No. 19-cv-04980-PJH) 14 LA CLINICA DE LA RAZA, et al., 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v.
17 DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., 18 Defendants. 19
20 21 Plaintiffs the State of California, State of Oregon, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 22 and District of Columbia’s (the “State plaintiffs”) and La Clínica de La Raza, African 23 Communities Together, California Primary Care Association, Central American Resource 24 Center, Farmworker Justice, Council on American-Islamic Relations-California, Korean 25 Resource Center, Maternal and Child Health Access, and Legal Aid Society of San 26 Mateo County’s…