Breathe Technologies, Inc. v. New Aera, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20205:19-cv-07691California453 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7

BREATHE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

8 Case No. 5:19-cv-07691-EJD Plaintiff, 9 ORDER DENYING AS MOOT v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO 10 COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY NEW AERA, INC., et al., OR ALTERNATIVELY TRANSFER 11 AND SILVERBOW'S MOTION TO Defendants. DISMISS 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 25, 30 13 On November 21, 2019, Plaintiff Breathe Technologies, Inc. filed the original complaint in 14 this action (the “Original Complaint”) (Dkt. No. 1). On March 10, 2020, Defendants Inogen, Inc. 15 (“Inogen”) and Todd W. Allum filed a motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiff’s Third, Fourth, 16 Fifth, Sixth, and Seventh Claims for Relief (“Motion to Compel”) (Dkt. No. 25). Defendant 17 Silverbow Development, LLC (“Silverbow”) joined the Motion to Compel (Dkt. No. 32). Inogen 18 also sought a stay pending arbitration, or alternatively a venue transfer of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.