Chaparro Navarro v. Department of Homeland Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20204:17-cv-06404California8,724 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ESTHEFANY CHAPARRO NAVARRO, et Case No. 17-cv-06404-DMR al., 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR 9 SUMMARY JUDGMENT v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 69, 73

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

11 HOMELAND SECURITY, et al.,

12 Defendants.

13 Plaintiffs Esthefany Chaparro Navarro (“Chaparro Navarro”) and Manuel Morales 14 Rodriguez (“Morales”) filed this action under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 15 U.S.C. § 701 et seq., and the Mandamus & Venue Act of 1962 (“MVA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1361, 16 seeking to reverse the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’s (“USCIS”) revocation 17 of Chaparro Navarro’s previously-approved Petition for U Nonimmigrant Status and the agency’s 18 consequent denial of derivative U nonimmigrant status to her father, Morales. Plaintiffs now 19 move pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 for summary judgment to reverse the 20 November 30, 2018 decision by USCIS’s Administrative Appeals Office affirming the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.