Bolden

Bolden v. Arana

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaApril 6, 20204:17-cv-05607California3,036 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIE BOLDEN, Case No. 17-cv-05607-PJH

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

S. ARANA, Re: Dkt. No. 57 Defendant.

12 This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His claims arise from his detention at San Quentin State Prison. The sole defendant in this case, Arana, filed a motion for summary judgment and a reply. Plaintiff filed an opposition and a sur-reply. The court has reviewed all of the filings and for the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is granted. BACKGROUND In the original complaint (Docket No. 1) plaintiff stated that defendant threatened to retaliate against him if plaintiff filed a grievance, stating, “I’ll get you for that.” Docket No. 1 at 7. Plaintiff also claimed he was found not guilty at a disciplinary hearing but that after defendant said, “No way. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.