Bolden
Bolden v. Arana
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIE BOLDEN, Case No. 17-cv-05607-PJH
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
S. ARANA, Re: Dkt. No. 57 Defendant.
12 This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. His claims arise from his detention at San Quentin State Prison. The sole defendant in this case, Arana, filed a motion for summary judgment and a reply. Plaintiff filed an opposition and a sur-reply. The court has reviewed all of the filings and for the reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is granted. BACKGROUND In the original complaint (Docket No. 1) plaintiff stated that defendant threatened to retaliate against him if plaintiff filed a grievance, stating, “I’ll get you for that.” Docket No. 1 at 7. Plaintiff also claimed he was found not guilty at a disciplinary hearing but that after defendant said, “No way. …