Bolden

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 WILLIE BOLDEN, Case No. 17-cv-05607-PJH

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10 S. ARANA, Re: Dkt. No. 57 Defendant. 11

12 13 This is a civil rights case brought pro se by a state prisoner under 42 U.S.C. § 14 1983. His claims arise from his detention at San Quentin State Prison. The sole 15 defendant in this case, Arana, filed a motion for summary judgment and a reply. Plaintiff 16 filed an opposition and a sur-reply. The court has reviewed all of the filings and for the 17 reasons set forth below, the motion for summary judgment is granted. 18 BACKGROUND 19 In the original complaint (Docket No. 1) plaintiff stated that defendant threatened to 20 retaliate against him if plaintiff filed a grievance, stating, “I’ll get you for that.” Docket No. 21 1 at 7. Plaintiff also claimed he was found not guilty at a disciplinary hearing but that 22 after defendant said, “No way. …